Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-08-31 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 12:52 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Greg. > > I think the following commit should go into -stable but forgot to cc > stable. It's now in Linus' tree. Can you please include it in > -stable? > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:13:07PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > >

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-08-02 Thread Luis Henriques
Tejun Heo writes: > Hello, Greg. > > I think the following commit should go into -stable but forgot to cc > stable. It's now in Linus' tree. Can you please include it in > -stable? > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:13:07PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> From bb9696192826a7d9279caf872e95b41

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-08-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:52:29PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Greg. > > I think the following commit should go into -stable but forgot to cc > stable. It's now in Linus' tree. Can you please include it in > -stable? Now applied, thanks. greg k-h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-07-29 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Greg. I think the following commit should go into -stable but forgot to cc stable. It's now in Linus' tree. Can you please include it in -stable? Thanks! On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:13:07PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > From bb9696192826a7d9279caf872e95b41bc26c7eff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >

Bug#714295: [PATCH libata/for-3.11-fixes] libata: make it clear that sata_inic162x is experimental

2013-07-26 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:57:20AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:13 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, guys. > > > > I've committed the following patch to for-3.11-fixes. It's > > unfortunate but I can't see a good way out at this point. :( > [...] > > This change is al