On 01/09/2014 07:56 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> Why should it be less useful than on other architectures? We
>> shouldn't differenciate between architectures in this regard,
>> IMO.
>
> Sorry, imprecise wording on my part. What I meant was, I wonder if
> the package has ever been *usable* on archi
On 01/08/2014 12:45 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 01/08/2014 07:24 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> I still wonder whether this package has ever been useful on
>> non-i386/amd64 architectures.
>
> Why should it be less useful than on other architectures? We shouldn't
> differenciate between ar
Hi!
On 01/08/2014 07:24 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> I still wonder whether this package has ever been useful on
> non-i386/amd64 architectures.
Why should it be less useful than on other architectures? We shouldn't
differenciate between architectures in this regard, IMO.
> For the short-term, so
On 01/05/2014 03:49 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 05/01/14 19:08, tony mancill wrote:
>>> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in
>>> 1.2.0-5. E.g., on powerpc:
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional
>> at all on those architectures before this
On 05/01/14 19:08, tony mancill wrote:
>> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in
>> 1.2.0-5. E.g., on powerpc:
>
> Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional
> at all on those architectures before this upload anyway.
I can run individual test for you i
On 01/05/2014 06:23 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Source: jblas
> Version: 1.2.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in 1.2.0-5. E.g., on
> powerpc:
Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional at all
on those architecture
Source: jblas
Version: 1.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in 1.2.0-5. E.g., on
powerpc:
...
test:
[junit] Running org.jblas.TestBlasDoubleComplex
[junit] Testsuite: org.jblas.TestBlasDoubleComplex
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0,
7 matches
Mail list logo