Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> Please find attached a new debdiff including the mentioned changes.
Anyone still following this or have I put everyone to sleep with my
lengthy patches? ;-)
Anyway, a last little update... In order to make things more solid, I
did what I proposed in my first post:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> Find attached the (hopefully) final debdiff from my side. It's big,
> but relatively easy to review because most of the changes can be
> interpreted independently.
Thanks for all your work on this, Martin.
Is someone looking at t
Hi all,
sorry for reacting too lazy.
Am Montag, den 06.10.2014, 02:33 +0100 schrieb Olly Betts:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> > Find attached the (hopefully) final debdiff from my side. It's big,
> > but relatively easy to review because most of the changes
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:11:56AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> PS: I was reluctant to upload the debdiff because I liked to see the
> patch for 2.0.6 (which has autoreconf fixed). Upstream want to get wx3.0
> support in for 2.0.7 and is actively working on getting it in the svn
> repository. So
El 09/10/14 a les 01:11, Benjamin Drung ha escrit:
Your patch needs to be forward ported,
We already have a patch that fixes 2.0.6 for wxWidgets 3.0. Back when
you asked me to forward-port my patch to the current svn head (in order
to get the changes into upstream), I did. Apart from the port
Hi Benjamin!
Martin Steghöfer wrote:
And before we just upload stuff to upstream, I'd also like to discuss
the upstream integration with the person that has been working on
wx3.0 there
Looking at the recent upstream activity, I've changed my mind about
this: We should get this into upstream
6 matches
Mail list logo