Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-07-13):
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 13 Jul 2014 00:55:14 +0200, a écrit :
Cyril Brulebois, le Sun 13 Jul 2014 00:23:31 +0200, a écrit :
and this is the expected version dependency at work. Just binNMU-ing
espeakup will fix it.
but anyway,
Package: espeakup-udeb
Version: 1.48.04+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: uninstallable
Hi,
this package can't be installed due to the version information for
espeak-data-udeb:
| $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.48.04+dfsg-1 '=' 1.48.04~; echo $?
| 0
| $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.48.04+dfsg-1 ''
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 12 Jul 2014 11:10:08 +0200, a écrit :
Package: espeakup-udeb
Version: 1.48.04+dfsg-1
this package can't be installed due to the version information for
espeak-data-udeb:
| $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.48.04+dfsg-1 '=' 1.48.04~; echo $?
| 0
| $ dpkg
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-07-13):
Well, yes, as I mentioned on the d-boot list, +dfsg was just added,
I wouldn't expect this suffix addition to matter as far as compatibility
is concerned…
and this is the expected version dependency at work. Just binNMU-ing
espeakup will fix
Cyril Brulebois, le Sun 13 Jul 2014 00:23:31 +0200, a écrit :
and this is the expected version dependency at work. Just binNMU-ing
espeakup will fix it.
but anyway, someone needs to perform the binNMUs or request them; and
I haven't seen anything on -wb-team@ yet.
Sure, I just hadn't
5 matches
Mail list logo
