Hi Adam,
Thanks for adding the tag and for the unblock!
Le 2014-11-26 20:08, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
I'm not sure "acceptable" is really the right word, and I've argued
with
myself a bunch over this, particularly given that sinfo+slurm-llnl is
basically a closed set for dependency purposes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + jessie-ignore
Bug #768112 [slurm-client] slurm-client: fails to upgrade from 'wheezy' -
trying to overwrite /usr/bin/sinfo
Added tag(s) jessie-ignore.
--
768112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768112
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Control: tags -1 + jessie-ignore
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:24 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Le 2014-11-08 10:53, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > On 2014-11-06 10:21, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
> >> Source: slurm-llnl
> >> Source-Version: 14.03.9-4
> >> We believe that the bug you
Le 2014-11-08 10:53, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Control: reopen -1
On 2014-11-06 10:21, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
Source: slurm-llnl
Source-Version: 14.03.9-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version
of
slurm-llnl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
Control: reopen -1
On 2014-11-06 10:21, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
Source: slurm-llnl
Source-Version: 14.03.9-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slurm-llnl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
[...]
slurm-llnl (14.03.9-4) unstable; urgency=
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #768112 {Done: Gennaro Oliva } [slurm-client]
slurm-client: fails to upgrade from 'wheezy' - trying to overwrite
/usr/bin/sinfo
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may ne
6 matches
Mail list logo
