Hi Lucas,
I uploaded ghc-7.6.3-20, which hopefully fixes or mitigates this issue.
Can you trigger a re-check of these somehow? Or should I just wait for
the normal course of things and see if you file a new report?
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2014, 13:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
The same error
On 30/11/14 at 14:17 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi Lucas,
I uploaded ghc-7.6.3-20, which hopefully fixes or mitigates this issue.
Can you trigger a re-check of these somehow? Or should I just wait for
the normal course of things and see if you file a new report?
Hi Joachim,
It's quite
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 15:14 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
It's quite painful to do partial rebuilds ... I will probably try to do
another rebuild soon, so it's easier for me to just wait for it.
perfect, thanks.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.11.2014, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hence my question to those in the know (hence CC’ing debian-dpkg):
How do I make sure that ghc-doc’s trigger is not run until all of
ghc-doc’s dependencies (and their dependencies) are installed (not
necessarily
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2014, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
We might have to add some pre-depends somewhere. Is anyone volunteering
to look into this issue?
I take that as a no.
So here is my analysis:
ghc-doc’s trigger runs haddock. Haddock requires libffi6. For some
reason, apt
Hi,
this looks pretty serious:
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2014, 13:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
The same error affects other haskell packages, so I'm only filing it
once, on that package, for now:
$ grep -lr 'haddock: error while loading shared libraries:
libffi.so.6:' . |grep log
6 matches
Mail list logo
