On 01/07/2015 10:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-01-08 05:17, tony mancill wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> Hello Hilko, Emmanuel,
>>
>> I'm taking a look at this, but in the interest of the jessie release, I
>> wanted to ask Emmanuel whether it would be okay to decrease the severity.
>>
>> We have a
Le 08/01/2015 07:41, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> If the bug only prevents "new packages" from being build (i.e. packages
> not already in Jessie/sid), it /sounds/ like it might not be RC after
> all (maybe "important"). However, please keep in mind that my answer is
> solely based on the above mail
On 2015-01-08 05:17, tony mancill wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> Hello Hilko, Emmanuel,
>
> I'm taking a look at this, but in the interest of the jessie release, I
> wanted to ask Emmanuel whether it would be okay to decrease the severity.
>
> We have a number of other packages with missing or incomplete
On 12/23/2014 08:55 PM, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Emmanuel Bourg:
>
>> Package: liblucene4-java
>> Version: 1:4.6.1+dfsg-2
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> The liblucene4-java package installs dummy pom.xml files in
>> /usr/share/maven-repo
>> which are missing important information to be usable by other
* Emmanuel Bourg:
> Package: liblucene4-java
> Version: 1:4.6.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The liblucene4-java package installs dummy pom.xml files in
> /usr/share/maven-repo
> which are missing important information to be usable by other packages.
Emmanuel,
thank you for finding and report
Package: liblucene4-java
Version: 1:4.6.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
The liblucene4-java package installs dummy pom.xml files in
/usr/share/maven-repo
which are missing important information to be usable by other packages.
For example the pom.xml for lucene-core is reduced to:
http://maven.a
6 matches
Mail list logo
