On 2015-02-22 17:50, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> In wheezy and later, where /etc/sudoers already is a conffile, that is
>> entirely for dpkg to handle, not for the *.preinst scripts. Anything in
>> the *.preinst is exclusively for when upgra
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> In wheezy and later, where /etc/sudoers already is a conffile, that is
> entirely for dpkg to handle, not for the *.preinst scripts. Anything in
> the *.preinst is exclusively for when upgrading from squeeze.
So, the more I think about it
On 2015-02-22 07:43, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> It's not backed up in jessie or later. The backup/md5sum stuff is
>> preceeded by a test for and old version less than "1.7.4p4-4", so in
>> wheezy and later, all the md5sum stuff is ignored d
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> It's not backed up in jessie or later. The backup/md5sum stuff is
> preceeded by a test for and old version less than "1.7.4p4-4", so in
> wheezy and later, all the md5sum stuff is ignored during upgrades.
It is most certainly backed up i
On 2015-02-22 02:05, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
>> issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
>> attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
>
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
> issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
> attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
I reviewed your proposed changes, but I don't thi
On 2015-02-07 01:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I have tested this patch in a number of combinations, including (but not
> limited to):
>
> sudo (squeeze) -> sudo (jessie) upgrade
> sudo-ldap (squeeze) -> sudo-ldap (jessie) upgrade
>
> Works as intended. An uncha
On 2015-02-18 22:32, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Christian Kastner writes:
>
>> Bdale, once such a confirmation (or another fix) is in, how would you
>> like to proceed? I could help with the RT communication again
>
> Sure. I'm willing to merge a patch and do uploads, but need to know
> which path t
Christian Kastner writes:
> Bdale, once such a confirmation (or another fix) is in, how would you
> like to proceed? I could help with the RT communication again
Sure. I'm willing to merge a patch and do uploads, but need to know
which path they want me to use since the sudo in unstable has div
Hi,
On 2015-02-07 01:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
> issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
> attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
>
> I have tested this patch in a number of combination
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi again,
On 2015-01-30 10:27, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2015-01-30 00:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Which is erroneously moved aside by sudo-ldap.preinst, thereafter dpkg
>> unpacks sudo-ldap, takes over file ownership (incl. conffiles) from sudo
>> and once it gets
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2015-01-30 00:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-01-29 23:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Which is erroneously moved aside by sudo-ldap.preinst, thereafter dpkg
> unpacks sudo-ldap, takes over file ownership (incl. conffiles) from sudo
> and once it gets around to ins
On 2015-01-29 23:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
> True. But as you observed in your initial report, the same bug can be
> triggered in a clean jessie environment, where the configuration file /
> conffile distinction is not a factor.
probably because the md5sums for wheezy and jessie are the same
>
On 2015-01-29 21:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> just to make notation clear
>
> /etc/sudoers is a *configuration file*, i.e. rules of preserving user
> changes apply
>
> since wheezy it is also a *conffile* i.e. shipped with the package at
> /etc/sudoers and managed by dpkg, not to be touched by m
just to make notation clear
/etc/sudoers is a *configuration file*, i.e. rules of preserving user
changes apply
since wheezy it is also a *conffile* i.e. shipped with the package at
/etc/sudoers and managed by dpkg, not to be touched by maintainer scripts
before it was managed by maintainer scri
I just noticed that I completely overlooked your other comments to my
original mail. Sorry about that!
On 2015-01-29 09:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-01-28 23:56, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> This is the first problem. It is of course possible for this file to be
>> generally absent (it's a
Hi Andreas,
I'm not quite sure we're on the same page yet, but I'm also not 100%
confident that I'm in the right. So here are some additional thoughts:
On 2015-01-29 09:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> And while switching sudo->sudo-ldap the following happens:
>
> sudo gets removed, conffile remain
Hi Christian,
thanks for looking into this.
What we have here is a conffile shared between two packages that
Conflicts+Replaces each other. That's even more weird than placing
conffiles in multi-arch:same packages ... at least they don't ship
different versions (but they did in lenny ...)
I thin
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:05:52 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The upgrade to jessie with sudo-ldap/jessie went smooth, and thereafter
> I wanted to switch to sudo/jessie, which failed due to missing
> /etc/sudoers, the problem is reproducible in plain jessie, too:
>
> # a
Package: sudo
Version: 1.8.10p3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
actually I only wanted to check whether sudo-ldap/wheezy leaving the
obsolete conffile /etc/init.d/sudo after upgrades to jessie could cause
problems. (Does not look like this, but you could consider using
dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffi
20 matches
Mail list logo
