On 2015-04-02 22:14, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 07:30:55PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
>> Hey Niels,
>>
>> Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
>> falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
>> Do you happen t
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 07:30:55PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> Hey Niels,
>
> Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
> falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
> Do you happen to know if there's another way to get access to
> tes
Vincent captured a gdb backtrace + the test-suite.log output for me.
Nothing's leaping out at me at a glance, I can take a closer look tonight.
Forwarded both upstream in case they can see what's going on.
Test failure seems to be capnp::_::(anonymous
namespace)::Capability_DynamicClientInheritanc
On 2015-03-30 04:30, Tom Lee wrote:
> Hey Niels,
>
> Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
> falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
> Do you happen to know if there's another way to get access to
> test-suite.log from thes
Hey Niels,
Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
Do you happen to know if there's another way to get access to
test-suite.log from these builds? The suggested work-around in that mail
Source: capnproto
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that the current version of capnproto FTBFS on armel and
armhf due to a segmentation fault in one of the tests. This prevents
the new version of migrating to testing as it is a regression compared
to the version in testing.
Thank
6 matches
Mail list logo
