Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Zach Vonler
On Thu, 14 May 2015 05:55:42 + Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote: TL;DR; So here comes my actual question: are you (Brian Pane, Zachary Vonler, Gian Filippo Pinzari) ok with retroactively regarding pre-3.8.1 code of DXPC (that you probably all worked on at that time)

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Kevin Vigor
By the way, poking around the interwebs I find there is an archive of the old DXPC mailing list available at: http://marc.info/?l=dxpcr=1w=2 I think you will find this of particular interest: http://marc.info/?l=dxpcm=93093790813555w=2 List: dxpc Subject:Re: future tecnologies

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Kevin, hi Zach, hi Francesco, hi all, @Francesco, please review the recent posts and sum up what to do next. - Original message - By the way, poking around the interwebs I find there is an archive of the old DXPC mailing list available at: http://marc.info/?l=dxpcr=1w=2 I

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Kevin Vigor
On 05/16/15 03:19, Mike Gabriel wrote: As I have not heard back neither from Brian Pane, Zachary Vonler nor Gian Filippo Pinzari (we had Ascension Day and maybe a prolonged weekend that people used for going on VAC), I will try looking at the DXPC changes between 3.7.0 and 3.8.1. Obviously,

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 18 May 2015 23:48:51 +0200 Mike Gabriel wrote: [...] @Francesco: that old post from Brian should be the statement we need, right? As Brian has not answered back, so far, does that post suffice? Yes, I am under the impression that it may be considered as evidence that Brian had always

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-18 Thread Kevin Vigor
On 5/18/2015 4:14 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: If it is confirmed that Gian Filippo contributed to the forking of DXPC within the NoMachine project, but not directly to DXPC, then I think that he made his contributions available under the terms of the GPL v2 of the NoMachine project. If this is

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-16 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi all, esp. Kevin, On Do 14 Mai 2015 06:58:09 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote: I looked at dxpc releases (I obtained upstream tarballs from snapshot.debian.org). I currently have: [mike@minobo dxpc.nxrebase (upstream-nxrebase)]$ git log commit 0676a768a96383641a73a72ecd2e1083322e6abe Author:

Bug#784565: [pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

2015-05-13 Thread Mike Gabriel
Dear Brian, dear Zachary, dear Gian Filippo, (Find a TL;DR; at the end of this mail...) I am contacting you on a licensing issue related to the DXPC code that you worked on at the end of the nineties. I'd highly appreciate it if you could take a little time to read this mail and get back to