Am 21.10.2015 um 08:33 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Biebl [2015-10-21 1:45 +0200]:
>> any particular reason why you didn't just use
>> systemctl (un)mask --runtime
>
> No particular one, but that looks a bit nicer indeed, and the code
> paths are already guarded with [ -d /r
Hello Michael,
Michael Biebl [2015-10-21 1:45 +0200]:
> any particular reason why you didn't just use
> systemctl (un)mask --runtime
No particular one, but that looks a bit nicer indeed, and the code
paths are already guarded with [ -d /run/systemd/system ]. Changed
this to systemctl now and upl
Hi,
Am 20.10.2015 um 05:56 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Martin Pitt [2015-10-20 5:27 +0200]:
>> For now I propose that the preinst temporarily masks polkitd.service
>> (ln -s /dev/null /run/systemd/system/polkitd.service), and the
>> postinst removes that symlink again, as
On 20/10/15 04:56, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Martin Pitt [2015-10-20 5:27 +0200]:
>> For now I propose that the preinst temporarily masks polkitd.service
>> (ln -s /dev/null /run/systemd/system/polkitd.service), and the
>> postinst removes that symlink again, as then the conffiles are all in
>> place.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #794723 [policykit-1] Policykit crashes systemd
Added tag(s) pending.
--
794723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794723
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Martin Pitt [2015-10-20 5:27 +0200]:
> For now I propose that the preinst temporarily masks polkitd.service
> (ln -s /dev/null /run/systemd/system/polkitd.service), and the
> postinst removes that symlink again, as then the conffiles are all in
> place. I just tested this
Hello all,
I was just investigating the corresponding Ubuntu bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1447654 as this just got new duplicates.
I finally realized what was going on here, but of course Simon figured
it all out well before me :-)
Simon McVittie [2015-10-11 14:28 +0100]:
> The reason that pol
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 at 14:28:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I can reproduce something very like this in a smaller stretch VM
After upgrading to current stretch package versions and rebooting
(to rule out #801354), I can still reproduce the "Connection timed
out" messages (apparently reliably) b
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 at 19:37:47 -0400, Carlos Kosloff wrote:
> I am installing a fresh version of testing, no desktop, just standard system
> utilities in a VM, the underlying software is virtualbox (from Oracle)
> Version 5.0.0r101573.
> After a dist-upgrade I installed xserver-xorg and then proce
Package: policykit-1
Version: 0.105-11
Severity: critical
Tags: stretch
Konsole output
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
10 matches
Mail list logo
