Hi Craig,
> :( It passed. This is what I meant by some of the buildds have funny
> setups which means this test fails but not all the time. It's always
> on a buildd but sometimes you reschedule the build and it goes fine.
Hmm. So, not only does that not sound very friendly to developers
wishing
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:04:44PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Sure - I can always reproduce locally outside all of the, uhh,
> reproducible stuff.
[...]
> bash TS 0
> expect TS 0
> test-schedbatch B 18
> PASS: ps SCHED_BATCH scheduler
:( It passed. This is what I
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, at 12:45 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> Any chance of getting testsuite/ps.log out of the buildds? It will give
> me exactly what the tester is unhappy about.
Sure - I can always reproduce locally outside all of the, uhh,
reproducible stuff.
(Attached.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:42:51AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> The full build log is attached or can be viewed here:
>
>
> https://reproducible.debian.net/logs/unstable/amd64/procps_3.3.10-4.build1.log.gz
Doesn't really help, its the ps sched test which means its something to
do with the
Source: procps
Version: 3.3.10-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
procps fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
5 matches
Mail list logo
