Bug#803369: swig: Please provide a symlink to the stable swig executable

Hi Torsten, >Thanks, that's actually what I expected to find. I am sure that I did >copy the links control file to the new swig sources. >Sometimes the difference between a working and a broken package is >running svn add :-) oh well, almost everyday I have to tell my colleagues to remember

Bug#803369: swig: Please provide a symlink to the stable swig executable

Hi Gianfranco, On 10/29/2015 04:03 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Indeed, that's how it is supposed to be. I have to check why it is > > not in included anymore. > > > because between 3.0.2 [1] and 3.0.7 [2] you took over the swig package > from swig2.0, without adding the links file [3] >

Bug#803369: swig: Please provide a symlink to the stable swig executable

On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable of the > stable release? > > swig -> swig3.0 Indeed, that's how it is supposed to be. I have to check why it is not in included anymore. Thanks for the Feedback, Torsten

Bug#803369: swig: Please provide a symlink to the stable swig executable

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:29:33 +0100 Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable of the > > stable release? > > > > swig -> swig3.0 > Indeed, that's how it is supposed to

Bug#803369: swig: Please provide a symlink to the stable swig executable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:29:33 +0100 Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: >> Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable >> of the stable release? >> >> swig