> > In either case, if you make a debdiff between 3.5.1-6.1 and 3.5.1-6.2
> > you will see that the changes made between those two versions may not
> > be the reason for this bug. In other words, the bug should be
> > somewhere else (toolchain, whatever), not in this source package.
>
> Or in the
On 2015-11-12 10:39, Santiago Vila wrote:
> But in theory we should not need to rebuild things. We have policies
> regarding package names and ABIs and transitions and all that.
>
> If this is one of those cases where a transition should have happened
> but it did not, it would be good at least
Control: reopen -1
On 2015-11-08 11:12, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
>> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
>> a release, thus the severity.
>
>
Package: libzeroc-ice3.5-cil
Version: 3.5.1-6.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
4 matches
Mail list logo
