Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-02-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: libvigraimpex Version: 1.10.0+git20160120.803d5d4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hello, the build-error on armel is different from the one on ppc64el (#812852: Failure in ChunkedMultiArrayTest). It fails at Building CXX

Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-02-26 Thread Ullrich Koethe
threadpool.hxx:333:26: error: return type 'class std::future' is incomplete ThreadPool::enqueue(F&& f) ^ This message is emitted by outdated compilers that lack sufficient C++11 support. What compiler did you use? If gcc: was the '-std=c++11' flag active? Best Ull

Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-03-01 Thread Ullrich Koethe
Since your toolchain apparently has no conforming implementation of std::thread, you might want to try boost::thread as a fall-back. To do so, please run cmake with the flag "-DWITH_BOOST_THREAD=1". Best Ulli On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:27:16 +0100 Andreas Metzler wrote: Package: libvigraimpex V

Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-03-01 Thread Daniel Stender
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:21:49 +0100 Ullrich Koethe wrote: > Since your toolchain apparently has no conforming implementation of > std::thread, you might want to try boost::thread as a fall-back. To do > so, please run cmake with the flag "-DWITH_BOOST_THREAD=1". > > Best > Ulli Yup, that works.

Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-03-01 Thread Ullrich Koethe
so, please run cmake with the flag "-DWITH_BOOST_THREAD=1". Yup, that works. Great. Ideally, we would like to activate this flag automatically for non-conforming compilers, or at least issue a warning. Is there a way for cmake to recognize your platform and toolchain? -- ** WARNING: You a

Bug#814606: libvigraimpex: FTBFS on armel (error: return type 'class std::future')

2016-03-01 Thread Daniel Stender
On 01.03.2016 19:16, Ullrich Koethe wrote: >>> so, please run cmake with the flag "-DWITH_BOOST_THREAD=1". >> >> Yup, that works. > > Great. Ideally, we would like to activate this flag automatically for > non-conforming compilers, or at least issue a warning. Is there a way for > cmake to recog