On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:22:44PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Olly Betts [160324 22:56]:
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:52:56PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > > BTW, there's a pkg-config file if you don't w
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:22:44PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Olly Betts [160324 22:56]:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:52:56PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > BTW, there's a pkg-config file if you don't want to go via
> > > RbConfig::CONFIG; if you do, it appears the rele
* Olly Betts [160324 22:56]:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:52:56PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Christian Hofstaedtler [160324 19:08]:
> > This might not be completely true; but even if the .so doesn't use
> > any of libruby's symbols, it's still built against libruby2.2 and
> > ends
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:52:56PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Christian Hofstaedtler [160324 19:08]:
> > your package implicitly depends ob libruby2.2, by means of shipping
> > an .so which uses symbols from libruby2.2. libruby2.2 is about to go
> > away from testing.
>
> This might
Hi,
* Christian Hofstaedtler [160324 19:08]:
> your package implicitly depends ob libruby2.2, by means of shipping
> an .so which uses symbols from libruby2.2. libruby2.2 is about to go
> away from testing.
This might not be completely true; but even if the .so doesn't use
any of libruby's symbo
5 matches
Mail list logo