Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

2016-07-12 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 06:29:14PM +0200, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: ... > PS: And I just noticed you did some work with uml-utilities. Thanks. Yes, I'm trying to upload a new revision. -- mattia :wq!

Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

2016-07-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Mattia, I just got back home from DebConf. On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 07:05 -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote: > >  > > Are there any plans for fixing it ? > > No. At the moment it doesn't make much sense to keep uml-utilities in > the archive. Even

Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

2016-07-11 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:05:05AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote: > No. At the moment it doesn't make much sense to keep uml-utilities in > the archive. Even if/when UML is re-added, it should be considered > whether uml-utilities are all that useful. I saw uml-utilities installed on many systems

Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

2016-07-06 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > As per the tracker, uml-utilities is marked for removal from the archive on > the > 19th of July. > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uml-utilities > > > Are there

Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

2016-07-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, As per the tracker, uml-utilities is marked for removal from the archive on the 19th of July. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uml-utilities Are there any plans for fixing it ? PS: I'm trying to bring back user-mode-linux back into the