Hi Andreas,
> please double check my commits whether all files end up where they
> should be. The package builds nor also for arch all binary packages.
>
> I also fixed some other minor issues.
>
> Hope this helps and let me know if it should be sponsored as it is
> now.
I am extremely gratefu
Dear Andreas,
> > I am really sorry, but despite hours of work and readings, I am still
> > totally unable to reproduce (and thus fix) this bug by myself.
> > [...]
>
> Try
>
> pdebuild [pbuilder options] -- --debbuildopts -A
>
> This will produce the broken package.
Great! The option "-A" w
On 2016-04-07 15:53, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> I am really sorry, but despite hours of work and readings, I am still totally
> unable to reproduce (and thus fix) this bug by myself.
>
> Andreas (Tille), would it be possible that there was a problem when you
> uploaded the package last Monday?
>
Hi Sébastien,
please double check my commits whether all files end up where they
should be. The package builds nor also for arch all binary packages.
I also fixed some other minor issues.
Hope this helps and let me know if it should be sponsored as it is
now.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Th
Dear all,
> Right. I was just wondering why this was actually happening on the buildd,
> until I realised that it was a source-only upload of orthonc.
>
> Sebastien: you can see a log of the package build for arch=all on the
> package tracker, or directly on
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:12:13AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-04-05 19:29, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > How it got there I cannot tell. AFAIK, arch=all packages are not rebuild
> > by autobuilders, so the -doc package in the archive should be the one
> > that you have uploaded. Maybe that
On 2016-04-05 19:29, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> How it got there I cannot tell. AFAIK, arch=all packages are not rebuild
> by autobuilders, so the -doc package in the archive should be the one
> that you have uploaded. Maybe that has changed, as the mail by anbe seems
arch:all packages can be build by
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:06:57AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank for reporting this issue. However, I need help: I am indeed unable to
> reproduce it...
>
> According to your report, the file
> "/usr/lib/orthanc/libModalityWorklists.so.1.0.0" lies both in package
> "o
Control: reassign -1 src:orthanc 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Control: retitle -1 building only arch:all packages broken: orthanc-doc
contains everything
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:06:57 +0200 (CEST) =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Jodogne
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank for reporting this issue. However, I need help: I am i
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:orthanc 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Bug #820062 [orthanc-doc,orthanc] orthanc and orthanc-doc: error when trying to
install together
Bug reassigned from package 'orthanc-doc,orthanc' to 'src:orthanc'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #820062 to the s
lt;<<
Could someone give me a hint? Is it because, as Ralf says at the end of his
report, the packages are slightly out of sync?
TIA,
Sébastien-
- Mail original -
> De: "Ralf Treinen"
> À: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 5 Avril 2016 08:44:44
> Objet:
Package: orthanc-doc,orthanc
Version: orthanc-doc/1.0.0+dfsg-1
Version: orthanc/1.0.0+dfsg-1+b1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2016-04-05
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at th
12 matches
Mail list logo
