Processed: Re: Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 828513 important Bug #828513 [src:proftpd-dfsg] proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 828513: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
severity 828513 important stop On 26.06.2016 12:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi Kurt > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempte

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 24.11.2016 18:34, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Hi, >> Still no solution for this. I've asked upstream if a patch for proftp >> stable (1.3.5) could be made available[1] too. Not sure if there will be >> some help. >> According to [2] one could use libssl1.0-dev as BD instead. >> Unfortunately thi

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 24.11.2016 um 18:34 schrieb Laurent Bigonville: On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:49:48 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= wrote: Hi, Still no solution for this. I've asked upstream if a patch for proftp stable (1.3.5) could be made available[1] too. Not sure if there will be some help. According t

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:49:48 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= wrote: > Am 26.06.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > Hi submitter, Hi, > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be foun

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 02.11.2016 10:49, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Kurt, > According to [2] one could use libssl1.0-dev as BD instead. > Unfortunately this removes libpq-dev, which is needed by our package > too. Not sure if the Postgres people will change here so we can use > the work around for stretch. > OK, the

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.06.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: Hi submitter, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/proftpd-dfsg_1.3.5a-1_am