Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2023-12-06 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi Matt, It looks like Zorian is rightfully disgusted forever: https://contributors.debian.org/contributor/misterhat-guest@alioth/ I'm not scared of a handful .ogg files without the matching .wav files, that's life, if these .ogg file were freely licensed as-is that's good enough. I will

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-10-29 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:46:56 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > On 10.10.2016 23:54, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > So in conclusion, I am still convinced that the Debian Project must > > distribute the source (for works included in packages in Debian main) > > anyway, regardless of how permissive

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-10-10 Thread Markus Koschany
On 10.10.2016 23:54, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > So in conclusion, I am still convinced that the Debian Project must > distribute the source (for works included in packages in Debian main) > anyway, regardless of how permissive is the license. I have commented on this bug report because I feel

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-10-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 00:04:16 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:19:50 +0200 Francesco Poli > wrote: [...] > > DFSG#2 requires the availability of source code. > > > > Hence, distributing the source-less files under a license that does not > > require

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-10-04 Thread Markus Koschany
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:19:50 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:54:27 -0500 Zorian M wrote: > > > I've sent an email to the author of "Devilish design" to request an > > additional CC-BY license > [...] > > Hello, > I stumbled upon this bug report

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-07-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:54:27 -0500 Zorian M wrote: > I've sent an email to the author of "Devilish design" to request an > additional CC-BY license [...] Hello, I stumbled upon this bug report and I feel like commenting on it. I disagree that re-licensing the rendered ogg files would be enough

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-07-22 Thread Zorian M
I've sent an email to the author of "Devilish design" to request an additional CC-BY license, and sent a PR on the edgar repository to re-credit the author of Medicine: https://github.com/riksweeney/edgar/pull/18 On 7/22/16, Guus Sliepen wrote: > Source: edgar > Severity:

Bug#832116: edgar: Source missing for some GPL licensed assets

2016-07-22 Thread Guus Sliepen
Source: edgar Severity: serious Justification: source missing for GPL licensed assets According to debian/copyright, the edgar-data package contains a number of songs which are licensed under the GPL-3+. However, only the final rendered music is present in the form of a .ogg file. > Files: >