On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:42:51AM +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:15:50PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:32:17 +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> >
> > > I've attached the debdiff, I'll push my changes to the git repo after
> > > the N
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:42:51 +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > > I've attached the debdiff, I'll push my changes to the git repo after
> > > the NMU has been uploaded, let me know if you don't agree with any of
> > > this.
> > Thanks for your help.
> > It might be easier to push the changes
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:15:50PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:32:17 +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
>
> > I've attached the debdiff, I'll push my changes to the git repo after
> > the NMU has been uploaded, let me know if you don't agree with any of
> > this.
>
> T
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:32:17 +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> I've attached the debdiff, I'll push my changes to the git repo after
> the NMU has been uploaded, let me know if you don't agree with any of
> this.
Thanks for your help.
It might be easier to push the changes to the git repo be
Control: tags 832840 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for license-reconcile (versioned as 0.12+nmu1)
I'll look for an sponsor and upload it.
The nmu includes an non uploaded change of yours, as is it
non-functional I've included it.
I've attached the debdiff, I'll push my chang
5 matches
Mail list logo
