Bug#833493: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:53:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Btw, how do you re-import repacked tarball with the same version ? > > git tag -d upstream/ > gbp import-orig > git tag -d upstream/ > git pull > > No idea whether this is the best solution but it works. umh,

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alex, On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything > > Thanks!, I just was working on that too :) > By reverting the commits the watch file was reverted too, but the new > one was better I think. >

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 08/16/2016 01:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I reverted my changes inside the master branch and currently the build > with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything Thanks!, I just was working on that too :) By reverting the commits the watch file was reverted

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I reverted my changes inside the master branch and currently the build with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything builds fine. Please again ping upstream to upgrade liblemon (and if you might be at it: Replacing liblocfit would be even better!) Kind regards

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Hi Andreas, On 08/16/2016 09:19 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Graham, > > thanks for your hint. Alexandre, what do you think about it? Feel free > to move my changes to a separate branch and try Graham's approach if you > think this is OK. I think it is better to keep the embedded copy of

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Liblemon created a longish discussion about copyright of autogenerated >files in binary packages but finally it hit unstable. The bad news is >that cufflinks does not build with this library. May be I should not >have choosen master branch but I commited my changes to Git with a >rebuilt

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, thanks for your hint. Alexandre, what do you think about it? Feel free to move my changes to a separate branch and try Graham's approach if you think this is OK. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:47:24PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Andreas > > I had a

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas I had a brief look at getting cufflinks to work with the new liblemon but did not make any progress. For now, I suggest making the following change (similar to Gianfranco's above). @@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ namespace lemon { } ExceptionMember& operator=(const ExceptionMember& copy) { -

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gianfranco, On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:18:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > actually the issue is lemon library, an embedded code copy. > I found the original library > https://lemon.cs.elte.hu/trac/lemon/wiki/Downloads > seems that the embedded code copy is around version 0.7 while

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >The problem is, if the package does not build I can't upload it with the >version ignorant boost. The only thing I can do is commiting the change >to Git which I did right now. thanks! >Anybody else reading here? actually the issue is lemon library, an embedded code copy. I found the

Bug#833493: cufflinks: FTBFS with gcc-6

2016-08-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gianfranco, On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:37:44AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > source: cufflinks > version: 2.2.1-2 > severity: serious > > Hi Andreas, as said in private emails, the package FTBFS with the new > toolchain, but what you didn't > notice, is that the failure is not boost