* Samuel Thibault [2016-08-22 19:52 +0200]:
> Elimar Riesebieter, on Mon 22 Aug 2016 19:33:26 +0200, wrote:
> > If that dosn't come tto mind we either
> > have to disable pthread (we can't forsee what breaks then)
>
> Disabling pthread just drops the mutexes, without
Elimar Riesebieter, on Mon 22 Aug 2016 19:33:26 +0200, wrote:
> If that dosn't come tto mind we either
> have to disable pthread (we can't forsee what breaks then)
Disabling pthread just drops the mutexes, without putting back the old
locking code...
Samuel
* Samuel Thibault [2016-08-20 14:12 +0200]:
> Jaroslav Kysela, on Wed 17 Aug 2016 19:46:42 +0200, wrote:
> > Dne 16.8.2016 v 23:03 Samuel Thibault napsal(a):
> > > - snd_pcm_new seems to initialize pcm->thread_safe to 0 by default, this
> > > does not seem safe.
3 matches
Mail list logo