Processed: Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package gajim Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'gajim' Limit currently set to 'package':'gajim' > severity 834399 normal Bug #834399 [gajim] Gajim GnuPG improvements Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-23 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
package gajim severity 834399 normal thanks Okay, this is not an issue with GnuPG 2 breaking Gajim, but with Gajim not being able to use GnuPG 2 properly. But then it is not serious, not even important, but normal : main functionnality of Gajim, which is instant messaging, it working fine, onl

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:59, t...@mirbsd.de said: > all agents, and logged in again) since the upgrade. This never was a > problem before, and, considering both gpg and gnupg2 can still use the > running/old agent, looks like it’s still no problem, so the warning is > silly at best. The warning is

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Werner Koch
Hi, some general comments: On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:36, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > ValueError: Unknown status message: u'KEY_CONSIDERED' Gajim's state machine for the status lines should ignore all status messages it does not know or need. We add new status lines every few releases and it is

Processed: Re: Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 834399 - moreinfo Bug #834399 [gajim] Gajim GnuPG improvements Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 834399: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834399 Debian B

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
tags 834399 - moreinfo thanks Daniel Kahn Gillmor dixit: >Control: reassign 834399 gajim >Control: retitle 834399 Gajim GnuPG improvements >Control: tags 834399 + moreinfo >Control: affects 834399 + gnupg Please always Cc the maintainers of the package when reassigning, as debbugs does NOT do th

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: reassign 834399 gajim Control: retitle 834399 Gajim GnuPG improvements Control: tags 834399 + moreinfo Control: affects 834399 + gnupg Hi Thorsten-- Thanks for the report, and for pointing out improvements that need to be made in Gajim's handling of OpenPGP. I'm documenting different pr