On Friday, 14 October 2016 5:24:53 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> (Despite this debdiff, asking for removal could possibly be a better
> idea as there's obviously not enough backing to properly support ppc64le
> right now and thus probably not for the lifetime of stretch.)
Andreas, thank you
Hello all.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:29:31PM +, Luca BRUNO wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:59:27 UTC Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>
> > Fwiw, there's a chain of {build-,}dependencies that would need to be
> > removed on ppc64el
>
> Ah, when I wrote my previous answer I didn't realize
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:59:27 UTC Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Fwiw, there's a chain of {build-,}dependencies that would need to be
> removed on ppc64el
Ah, when I wrote my previous answer I didn't realize that.
Upon further inspection, it looks like it may be just enough to cherry-pick
t
Hello all.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:42:37AM +, Luca BRUNO wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 October 2016 21:18:07 UTC Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x:
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt
> >
> > Any ideas what we can do about it?
>
> s390(
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 21:18:07 UTC Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt
>
> Any ideas what we can do about it?
s390(x) is not supported upstream for the moment, but this shouldn't be a
blocker as it has
Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt
Any ideas what we can do about it?
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Free speech is the bedrock of liberty and a free society. And yes, it
includes the right to blaspheme and offend.
-- Ayaan H
On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 8:03:28 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Excuse me for being very naive here, but this is my first encounter
> with (packaging) go.
>
> The attached patch seems to make the appc-spec package build for me
Awesome. Thank you very much Andreas. On my own I could not se
On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 3:41:59 PM AEDT Jonathan Boulle wrote:
> Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7
> FTBFS?
Thank you for following our progress, Jonathan.
This problem happened on my dev box when I tried to prepare new upload of
appc-spec:
src/githu
Hello all!
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:41:59PM +0200, Jonathan Boulle wrote:
> Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7
> FTBFS?
Excuse me for being very naive here, but this is my first encounter
with (packaging) go.
The attached patch seems to make the appc-spec pa
Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7
FTBFS?
On 11 October 2016 at 04:24, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:56:05 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Is there anything holding back uploading a new version (which should
> > resolve the issue
On Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:56:05 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Is there anything holding back uploading a new version (which should
> resolve the issues)?
Unfortunately rkt is held by "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7 which FTBFS due
to sub-vendored "go4.org/errorutil". At the moment I do
Hello!
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:29:39AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote:
> PPC support looks like it has been added in rkt 1.14 and above [1].
> According to the
> release notes on golang.org, experimental support has been added for s390
> systems
> in Go 1.7. We're currently up
On 29 Aug 2016, at 8:59 PM, Luca BRUNO wrote:
>
> 1.13.0+dfsg-1 has been built without issues on i386:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rkt&arch=i386&ver=1.13.0%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1472188080
>
> ppc64 and s390x are in progress upstream and should hopefully
> be back in the next relea
1.13.0+dfsg-1 has been built without issues on i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rkt&arch=i386&ver=1.13.0%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1472188080
ppc64 and s390x are in progress upstream and should hopefully
be back in the next releases.
Ciao, Luca
--
«Доверяй, но проверяй»
signature.asc
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 8:50:33 PM AEST Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release),
> the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that
> require similar fixes.
1.13.0 still FTBFS on i386 for another reason:
https://githu
Source: rkt
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
rkt FTBFS on several architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt
The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release),
the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that
require simi
16 matches
Mail list logo