Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-10-08 Thread Niels Thykier
Kees Cook: > Hi Niels, > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:35:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Lintian has embedded the checks, but has not taken over the tool. > > As in copy/pasted the logic, or is still calling out to hardening-check? > > [...] > > -Kees > As in, extracted the logic and put

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-10-08 Thread Kees Cook
Hi Niels, On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:35:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Lintian has embedded the checks, but has not taken over the tool. As in copy/pasted the logic, or is still calling out to hardening-check? > There were talk about putting the actual tool in devscritps, but I don't > know

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-10-06 Thread Niels Thykier
Moritz Muehlenhoff: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? >>> dpkg-buildflags/dh >>> are around for a long time now and we're down

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-10-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? > > dpkg-buildflags/dh > > are around for a long time now and we're down to about 50 reverse >

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-09-15 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:10:04PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2016-09-15 08:14 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >> > I think we should remove

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-09-15 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2016-09-15 08:14 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> > I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? >> > dpkg-buildflags/dh >> > are around

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-09-15 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? > > dpkg-buildflags/dh > > are around for a long time now and we're down to about 50 reverse >

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-09-14 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? > dpkg-buildflags/dh > are around for a long time now and we're down to about 50 reverse > dependencies at > this point. Plus, lintian marks it as deprecated

Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: hardening-wrapper Version: 2.8+nmu2 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch starting with binutils 2.27-6, binutils now ships the triplet prefixed binaries as files instead of symlinks. hardening-wrapper now has to divert the triplet prefixed binaries. however looking at the upload rate