On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:26AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
> > wrote:
> > > BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea.
> > > Maintainers often ask bug reporters fo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:26AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
> wrote:
> > BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea.
> > Maintainers often ask bug reporters for "a way to reproduce the error".
> > But if the build i
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
> BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea.
> Maintainers often ask bug reporters for "a way to reproduce the error".
> But if the build is based on random variables, this becomes an
> impossible task. Please co
Package: src:ruby-concurrent
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
--
4 matches
Mail list logo