pini a écrit le 04/12/2016 à 12:42 :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:06:27 +0100 Andreas Tille
> wrote:
>> Hi Bernd,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:54:21AM +0100, Bernd Rinn wrote:
>>> the migration of JHDF5 to HDF5 1.10 is ongoing and mostly depend on me
>>> having a block of time I can spend
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:06:27 +0100 Andreas Tille
wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:54:21AM +0100, Bernd Rinn wrote:
> > the migration of JHDF5 to HDF5 1.10 is ongoing and mostly depend on me
> > having a block of time I can spend on it. Your analysis of the work that
> > need
Hi Bernd,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:54:21AM +0100, Bernd Rinn wrote:
> the migration of JHDF5 to HDF5 1.10 is ongoing and mostly depend on me
> having a block of time I can spend on it. Your analysis of the work that
> needs to be done is right from what I can see. The plan is to switch to
> usin
Hi Andreas,
the migration of JHDF5 to HDF5 1.10 is ongoing and mostly depend on me
having a block of time I can spend on it. Your analysis of the work that
needs to be done is right from what I can see. The plan is to switch to
using the JNI library from the HDF group wherever possible (it may sti
Hi Bernd,
I'm hereby forwarding the main parts of the discussion of the bug report
which might contain hints what to do to make jhdf5 compliant with hdf5
version 1.10.
It would be nice if you could give us a hint if you were able to fix this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at
5 matches
Mail list logo
