Control: severity -1 important
With wmbiff version 0.4.30-2, just uploaded to sid, the offending test
(test_wmbiff) is now skipped on big endian archs like s390x. Therefore,
the package now builds on these archs.
The underlying problem still exists, but I am reducing the severity to
importa
On 12/02/2016 12:58 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:44:05AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
test such problems.
Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past. I'm no
Hi Doug
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:44:05AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
> On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
> >test such problems.
> Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past. I'm not a DD or DM, and
> the process
On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
Thanks for your reply!
I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works!
You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
test such problems.
Y
Hi Doug
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
> Thanks for your reply!
> I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works!
You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
test such problems.
Regards,
Bastian
--
Actual war is a
On 11/24/2016 08:25 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
Error connecting: Invalid argument
connect(0.0.3.255:-7907) failed: Invalid argument
I would start here. The IP/port information is converted incorrectly.
I assume it's this function:
Hi Doug
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
> > Error connecting: Invalid argument
> > connect(0.0.3.255:-7907) failed: Invalid argument
I would start here. The IP/port information is converted incorrectly.
I assume it's this function:
| static int ipv4_sock_connect(s
Hello!
I am copying the RC bug below to the s390 mailing list. I am stumped as
to what is going on. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank you!
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:55 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: wmbiff
> Version: 0.4.29-1
> Severity: serious
>
>
https://buildd.debian.org/sta
8 matches
Mail list logo