On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:33:51AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>...
> I think the way forward would be to make that bump and
> rebuild the only dependency (pam-p11) against it, but I'm not 100%
> sure pam-p11 compiles with openssl 1.1.
>...
It does not:
pam_p11.c:270:29: error: dereferencing point
Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. I've canceled this upload
since it has the side-effect of breaking libp11 (ie it bumps it's
soname). I think the way forward would be to make that bump and
rebuild the only dependency (pam-p11) against it, but I'm not 100%
sure pam-p11 compiles with openss
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:33:41 -0700 Luke W Faraone wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017 19:45:51 -0700 Luke W Faraone
> wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to fix the path to the engine directory, and moves
> > this library back to libssl-dev. (it isn't clear to me from changelog or
> > git log why the move to
On Thu, 11 May 2017 19:45:51 -0700 Luke W Faraone
wrote:
> Attached is a patch to fix the path to the engine directory, and moves
> this library back to libssl-dev. (it isn't clear to me from changelog or
> git log why the move to 1.1 was originally reverted)
And of course, that patch was bogus.
control: tag 846548 + patch
On Sat, 6 May 2017 19:07:50 +0200 Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm raising severity to serious since as far as I can see the package is
> currently unusable in testing without a rebuild.
Sadly not even a rebuild will fix it. The issue is that debian/rules
specifie
5 matches
Mail list logo
