On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 04:41:30PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:12:13 +0100 Santiago Vila
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > > The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS,
> >
> >
Hi Santiago,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:12:13 +0100 Santiago Vila
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS,
>
> Hi. I checked that a rebuild fixed the issue, but I've also removed
> the -march th
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS,
Hi. I checked that a rebuild fixed the issue, but I've also removed
the -march thing to be safe.
Thanks a lot.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS, I
> am not sure if this is compatible with the Pentium 4. You could try
> rebuilding crafty with and without this flag to find out.
To make things more funny, one
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-01-11 18:58 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Bug in binutils at the time the package was built?
>
> The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS, I
> am not sure if this is compatible with the Pentium
On 2017-01-11 18:58 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: crafty
> Version: 23.4-6+b1
> Severity: grave
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> Packages which build-depend on crafty FTBFS on every of my old
> Dual-Core Pentium 4 running stretch/amd64.
>
> $ crafty
> Illegal instruction
>
> The output of /proc/c
Package: crafty
Version: 23.4-6+b1
Severity: grave
Dear maintainer:
Packages which build-depend on crafty FTBFS on every of my old
Dual-Core Pentium 4 running stretch/amd64.
$ crafty
Illegal instruction
The output of /proc/cpuinfo is attached.
Bug in binutils at the time the package was built?
7 matches
Mail list logo