Bug#856625: [Python-modules-team] Bug#856625: parsedatetime: FTBFS (AssertionError: 0.0666666666667 is not less than 0.05)

2017-03-10 Thread Brian May
Santiago Vila writes: > Maybe this "only" fails shortly after February 28th, but we really want > tests to never fail. It is possible that this package assumes one or more > things in the following list?: Fixed in unstable and unblock request sent: #857430 -- Brian May

Bug#856625: [Python-modules-team] Bug#856625: parsedatetime: FTBFS (AssertionError: 0.0666666666667 is not less than 0.05)

2017-03-10 Thread Brian May
Santiago Vila writes: > Maybe this "only" fails shortly after February 28th, but we really want > tests to never fail. It is possible that this package assumes one or more > things in the following list?: To me it looks like the test is assuming a month is 30 days. It allows some margin for erro

Bug#856625: parsedatetime: FTBFS (AssertionError: 0.0666666666667 is not less than 0.05)

2017-03-02 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:parsedatetime Version: 2.1-2 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" but it failed: [...] debian/rules build-indep dh build-indep --with