Your message dated Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:49:28 +0100
with message-id <084bd120-f1a2-fff3-1471-673f008fe...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#787051: marked as done
(libjs-rickshaw: Documentation references nonexistent files)
has caused the Debian Bug report #857993,
regarding rickshaw: Please do not build-depend on npm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
857993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rickshaw
Severity: important
Please remove the useless Build-Depends: npm,
for i intend to ask removal of npm from testing.
The package builds fine in sbuild without npm.
Jérémy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[resend to the right bug -done address]
reopen 787051
fixed 857993 1.5.1.dfsg-2
thanks
On 19-03-17 23:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Subject:
> libjs-rickshaw: Documentation references nonexistent files
Doesn't match:
> Changes:
> rickshaw (1.5.1.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Remove npm build dependency (closes: #787051).
I believe this should have been 857993, so I close that now instead.
Paul
PS: I tried to find the git repository for rickshaw, but couldn't find
it on git.debian.org. Does anybody know where it went? d/control is
wrong in this case; probably warrants a new bug report.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
