On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:30:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> FYI, I have unblocked the r-cran-rcppgsl upload in its current form.
Thanks, Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Andreas Tille:
> Package: r-cran-rcppgsl
> Version: 0.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> [...]
> $ diff -u debian/control.old debian/control
> --- debian/control.old 2017-03-27 06:35:41.0 +
> +++ debian/control 2017-03-28 07:38:03.
Hi Dirk,
did you do any means that the issue will also be fixed in testing?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:09:31PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > | Uploads to testing-proposed-updates are working fine.
> >
> > I could re-upload.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean w
Hi Dirk,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:25:34AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> | > ... If you want to fix the issue inside
> | > r-cran-rcppgsl package you need to either convince the release team to
> | > accept this new upstream v
On 28 March 2017 at 14:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
| > ... If you want to fix the issue inside
| > r-cran-rcppgsl package you need to either convince the release team to
| > accept this new upstream version or revert the new version by us
On 28 March 2017 at 13:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:24:02AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | Alternatively this could be fixed by moving the script gsl-config from
| > | package libgsl-dev to libgsl2. Since you are the maintainer of both
| >
| > I am w
Hi Dirk,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:24:02AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | Alternatively this could be fixed by moving the script gsl-config from
> | package libgsl-dev to libgsl2. Since you are the maintainer of both
>
> I am wondering if it was in lbgsl0 before the move to 'gsl2'. I shoul
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> ... If you want to fix the issue inside
> r-cran-rcppgsl package you need to either convince the release team to
> accept this new upstream version or revert the new version by using an
> epoch. I have CCed the release team where you
The other possible fix is upstream -- I could just not assume I always have
gsl-config and make its use conditional. That's probably the best idea going
forward to support pure 'run-time, not dev' packages better.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
On 28 March 2017 at 10:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Package: r-cran-rcppgsl
| Version: 0.3.2-1
| Severity: grave
| Tags: patch
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| [ Release team see below how to deal with newer upstream version in unstable
| than in testing ]
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
|
Package: r-cran-rcppgsl
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
[ Release team see below how to deal with newer upstream version in unstable
than in testing ]
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriat
11 matches
Mail list logo
