Processed: Re: Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #859660 [artemis] artemis running issue Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #859660 [artemis] artemis running issue Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 859660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859660 Debia

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Tony, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:11:52AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and > binfmt-support. IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of > this, but at the mome

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-28 Thread tony mancill
Hi Andreas, This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and binfmt-support. IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of this, but at the moment I cannot locate the details of that exchange. It was something along the lines of there being multiple interpreters reg

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Java developers, is there any known issue with running JARs via symlink to /usr/bin? I suspect this is the problem with this bug but I wonder what might be the recommended way from Java team about this way to start Java programs that used to work but is not always relieable. Kind regards

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:17:08PM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi, > > > على الأربعاء 5 نيسـان 2017 ‫12:32، كتب Jerome: > >> When running artemis package, get this issue : > >> > >> $ art > >> bash: /usr/bin/art: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error > > Probably something to d