On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I feel like we have had the substitution of R (>= 'currentBuildVersion') for
> a decade.
I didn't realize that it was the current build version; I just assumed
it was updated manually.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong
On 27 April 2017 at 11:37, Don Armstrong wrote:
| On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I don't know, and I tend not to run dated r-base-core packages.
|
| I'll try to check this out later.
Thanks!
| > Is that what debian/control ensures?
|
| Cool; I didn't check to see whether th
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I don't know, and I tend not to run dated r-base-core packages.
I'll try to check this out later.
> Is that what debian/control ensures?
Cool; I didn't check to see whether the substitution variable had been
updated.
> I uploaded one beta build to
On 27 April 2017 at 12:49, Don Armstrong wrote:
| Control: severity -1 serious
|
| Do we know if this issue may also mean that any packages built with this
| new version are incompatible with older R versions? [I'm thinking so,
| but my ABI-fu is not super strong.]
I don't know, and I tend not t
4 matches
Mail list logo