Bug#864719: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#864719: Bug#864719: slapd: fails to configure when olcSuffix contains a backslash-escaped umlaut

2017-06-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Ryan Tandy wrote: > from before my time. I don't have the energy for a wholesale update of the > code style, but I'm updating pieces to a style like you suggest as I touch Ah, okay. > them. The diff was meant as an example of a very minimal change that would be > suitable fo

Bug#864719: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#864719: Bug#864719: slapd: fails to configure when olcSuffix contains a backslash-escaped umlaut

2017-06-15 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: For the backslashes case, the attached ought to do. Would you be willing to test it? It should apply to /var/lib/dpkg/info/slapd.postinst. The patch works as-is, however, as a shell author and informed about writing portable shell

Bug#864719: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#864719: Bug#864719: slapd: fails to configure when olcSuffix contains a backslash-escaped umlaut

2017-06-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Ryan Tandy wrote: >> Hi Thorsten, thanks for reporting this. You’re welcome. >> (But I'm curious: how did you wind up with the escaped form on wheezy? For >> me, slapd via ldapmodify and slapadd both write it in base64.) I’ve first set up the test server, then, in order to

Bug#864719: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#864719: Bug#864719: slapd: fails to configure when olcSuffix contains a backslash-escaped umlaut

2017-06-13 Thread Ryan Tandy
For the backslashes case, the attached ought to do. Would you be willing to test it? It should apply to /var/lib/dpkg/info/slapd.postinst. Still thinking about the base64 case. Since we use the suffix to name files and directories for backup and restore, I guess it's most robust to just use th