Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed

2017-08-31 Thread Philippe Thierry
Le 31/08/2017 à 20:56, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Sorry my bad, then a binNMU should be sufficient. Yes this is the case here :-) > > But since you anyway plan an upload for #873783 this will en passant > also fix this problem. > >> but if I update the package version (to 0.0.2+dfsg-2), the >> upgra

Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed

2017-08-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:43:35PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote: > Hello! > > Le 31/08/2017 à 16:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > Package: wcc > > Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is t

Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed

2017-08-31 Thread Philippe Thierry
Hello! Le 31/08/2017 à 16:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Package: wcc > Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed Thanks for the report. I've check where the error comes from. This i

Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed

2017-08-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: wcc Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed -- System Information: Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)