On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:13:24 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
said:
> Thanks for your feedback. Any preference from you to keep it in the
> delayed queue or speed processing up? (feel free as well to just
> reschedule it).
I don't have any preference. If you want to speed up processing, then
go ahea
Hi!
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 03:40:44PM -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 11:04:25 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
> said:
>
> > Dear maintainer,
>
> > I've prepared an NMU for ufraw (versioned as 0.22-3.1) and uploaded it
> > to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should del
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 11:04:25 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
said:
> Dear maintainer,
> I've prepared an NMU for ufraw (versioned as 0.22-3.1) and uploaded it
> to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Hi Salvatore,
Thank you very much for the NMU. I have no objectio
Control: tags 890086 + patch
Control: tags 890086 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ufraw (versioned as 0.22-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru ufraw-0.22/debian/changelog ufraw-0.22/debian/ch
4 matches
Mail list logo