Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:24:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Is TensorFlow different from libtensorflow, already in unstable:
experimental
> libtensorflow-cc1.
[Lumin]
>> Is there some estimated time frame to package TensorFlow?
>
> No estimated time frame for it. TensorFlow provides bazel build for
> linux and cmake build for windows. Bazel itself is blocking for years,
> and a DD, Paul Liu, who worked on it in the past had said that it was
> hard to d
Hello Debian-Science folks,
Please feel free to CC me if you need any input about deep learning.
> From: Andreas Tille
> the description says:
>
> ... Alternatively, Keras could run on Google's
> TensorFlow (not yet available in Debian, but coming up).
>
> Is there some estimated time frame
The upstream must have changed the default backend which is not surprising,
it should be fixable with a patch. I can look into it in a few days when I
am back from vacation and in front of a computer again. The autotestpkg
tests set KERAS_BACKEND=theano which is why this was missed. In the
meantime
Hi,
the description says:
... Alternatively, Keras could run on Google's
TensorFlow (not yet available in Debian, but coming up).
Is there some estimated time frame to package TensorFlow?
If not please try to deactivate this alternative since the package does
not work as this bug report expl
5 matches
Mail list logo
