On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:49:53PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:33:58AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + patch
> > >
> > > Le 06/05/2018 à 02:13, James McCoy a écrit :
> > >
> > > > It lo
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:33:58AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + patch
> >
> > Le 06/05/2018 à 02:13, James McCoy a écrit :
> >
> > > It looks like that will do the right thing. Now I just need to figure
> > > o
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Le 06/05/2018 à 02:13, James McCoy a écrit :
>
> > It looks like that will do the right thing. Now I just need to figure
> > out the larger issue of adapting upstream's build system.
>
> I've managed
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #897555 [src:subversion] subversion: FTBFS: /bin/bash:
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javah: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
--
897555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897555
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Control: tags -1 + patch
Le 06/05/2018 à 02:13, James McCoy a écrit :
> It looks like that will do the right thing. Now I just need to figure
> out the larger issue of adapting upstream's build system.
I've managed to patch the EZT Make template to use 'javac -h' instead of
javah. A few classes
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:25:03PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2018 22:11:49 -0400 James McCoy wrote:
>
> > Ah, that's because the javah command was removed in Java 10, to be
> > replaced by running "javac -h".
> >
> > It would have been useful to get a notice about this ahead o
On Wed, 2 May 2018 22:11:49 -0400 James McCoy wrote:
> Ah, that's because the javah command was removed in Java 10, to be
> replaced by running "javac -h".
>
> It would have been useful to get a notice about this ahead of time, for
> those not as involved with Java. Especially since this has ap
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:02:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > [snip]
> > /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javah -force -d
> > subversion/bindings/javahl/include -classpath
> > su
Source: subversion
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
9 matches
Mail list logo