Hi Mehdi,
Just saw that you've fixed that in the new upload.
Thanks for taking care of it!
Best regards,
Andy
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 2018-05-25 08:40, Andy Li wrote:
>
>> I've a patch:
>> https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-
Hi Andy,
On 2018-05-25 08:40, Andy Li wrote:
I've a patch:
https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch
It's based on the discussion with upstream at
https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/the-forever-beta-issue/1779/6
In fact, the patch introduces a bug and makes the build fail
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> I have the feeling that OPAM team is not willing to support OPAM 1.2.2
> for a long time. So it doesn't make sense, at least for me, to
> include it in Buster.
>
> Yesterday, I've uploaded opam-file-format to NEW. As soon as it gets
> accept
Hi Andy,
On 2018-05-25 08:40, Andy Li wrote:
I've a patch:
https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch
That's great!
FWIW, I've opened this bug report so that Opam doesn't migrate to
testing before being fixed or updated to a newer version. I have
the feeling that OPA
I've a patch:
https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch
It's based on the discussion with upstream at
https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/the-forever-beta-issue/1779/6
Best regards,
Andy
Package: opam
Version: 1.2.2-6+b1
Severity: serious
opam fails to build from source using latest cmdliner which was uploaded
to Debian/Sid a few days ago:
File "client/opamArg.ml", line 384, characters 25-29:
Error: This expression has type
?docv:string ->
(string -> ('a, [ `Msg
6 matches
Mail list logo
