Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-09-25 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Graham, On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 20:48 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Abou > > On 23 September 2018 at 22:44, Abou Al Montacir > wrote: > > I've reverted this in b9ccece9. However this means that Bug#898310 needs to > > be reopen. > > Thanks, I have a reassigned #906349 so it can be closed

Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-09-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Abou On 23 September 2018 at 22:44, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > I've reverted this in b9ccece9. However this means that Bug#898310 needs to > be reopen. Thanks, I have a reassigned #906349 so it can be closed when lazarus is uploaded. Shall I go ahead with an upload, or do you wish to make

Bug#906349: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-09-23 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Graham, On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 15:40 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Abou > > On 27/08/2018 18:03, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > Maybe we shall think more about this change. Removing the manually flag > > leads to > > a deeper question: Do we need to distribute LCL units in binary form if they >

Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-09-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Abou On 27/08/2018 18:03, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Maybe we shall think more about this change. Removing the manually flag leads to a deeper question: Do we need to distribute LCL units in binary form if they will get recompiled anyway? Have you had any time to consider this? Both

Bug#906349: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#906349: Bug#906349: Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-08-27 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Graham, On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 15:33 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Abou > > On 17/08/2018 18:37, Graham Inggs wrote: > > Abou, do you have an opinion on whether this is a bug in lazarus, or > > does the doublecmd packaging need to be fixed? I just returned back from vacation, let me check

Bug#906349: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#906349: Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-08-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Abou On 17/08/2018 18:37, Graham Inggs wrote: Abou, do you have an opinion on whether this is a bug in lazarus, or does the doublecmd packaging need to be fixed? The same problem occurs in ddrescueview, reported in #906458. I found it was introduced by the changes to debian/rules in this

Bug#906349: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-08-17 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Santiago, Abou On 17 August 2018 at 13:19, Santiago Vila wrote: > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: Thanks for the report! According to reproducible builds, doublecmd started to FTBFS in unstable on 2018-07-20 [1]. This was shortly after the upload of lazarus

Bug#906349: doublecmd: FTBFS in buster/sid (tries to write in /usr)

2018-08-17 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:doublecmd Version: 0.8.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: [...] debian/rules build-indep dh build-indep