On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:11:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas,
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:57:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > Indeed, with this pbbam now passes its autopkgtests on all three
> > > architectures in Ubuntu. Attached is a complete patch against
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:57:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, with this pbbam now passes its autopkgtests on all three
> > architectures in Ubuntu. Attached is a complete patch against pbbam
> > 0.19.0+dfsg-3 for this.
>
> Thanks, I've done NMUs for both this problem a
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:59:55PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:10:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > And then there is the unrelat
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:10:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > > migration of pbbam.
>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > migration of pbbam.
>
> > Steve seems to be addressing this with
> > http://launchpadlibra
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:56:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Regardless, the autopkgtest problem is not amd64-specific, because at least
> for Ubuntu, we do not size our autopkgtest runners any differently on amd64
> than on other architectures. Fixing the autopkgtest to not require a full
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:45:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > > migrati
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:45:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > > migra
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > migration of pbbam.
>
> > Steve seems to be addressing this with
> > http://lau
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> migration of pbbam.
> Steve seems to be addressing this with
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/409374477/pbbam_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff.gz
And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
migration of pbbam.
Steve seems to be addressing this with
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/409374477/pbbam_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff.gz
Adrian
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:04:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >Bug#916576: pbdagcon: FTBFS pbdata/Types.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > I need to make some noise in the team since I'm definitely overwo
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Bug#916576: pbdagcon: FTBFS pbdata/Types.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > I need to make some noise in the team since I'm definitely overworked
> > with these pb* packages. It might be that we will loose these for
13 matches
Mail list logo