Hi Stephen,
Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I have figured out what was wrong (cue brown paper bag for me), I’ll upload a
> fix shortly.
Yay, thanks! Much appreciated!
> > Not sure if any of these fix this issue.
>
> 0.3.1 was already in unstable,
Oops, ok, sorry, my fault for not looking closer.
> but
Hi Axel,
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:29:04 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Dear Maintainer,
>
> You're writing to yourself as "Dear Maintainer"? :-)
I didn’t bother changing the reportbug template, and who knows the maintainer
might not always be me ;-).
> > Version 0.3 of in
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
You're writing to yourself as "Dear Maintainer"? :-)
> Version 0.3 of infnoise busy-waits; 0.2.6 didn’t, so this is a
> regression.
Any news on this? I just dist-upgraded a box which has a Infinite
Noise TRNG connected from Buster to Bullseye a
Package: infnoise
Version: 0.3.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Version 0.3 of infnoise busy-waits; 0.2.6 didn’t, so this is a
regression.
I’m designating this as serious to prevent 0.3 from migrating to
testing.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.5
APT pr
4 matches
Mail list logo
