Hello,
Am Freitag, den 23.11.2018, 16:30 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon:
> Dear all
>
> Thank to Paul for your answers about the autoremoval and explanation
> about the ABI problem. It seems that Adrian Bunk's triage message in
> 909120 (added blocking bug(s) of 909120: 911793) did push the
Dear all
Thank to Paul for your answers about the autoremoval and explanation
about the ABI problem. It seems that Adrian Bunk's triage message in
909120 (added blocking bug(s) of 909120: 911793) did push the
autoremoval for another month (thanks to Adrian as well, as that's
exactly what is
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:22:23PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Also, before doing that somebody should check all the other binaries,
> > and verify they didn't change their ABI either.
>
> Which binaries ? Those build from src:gdcm ?
Yup. I didn't check libgdcm2.8, it should be checked.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:04 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:41:10AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > As you've noticed the ABI breakage occur in between two minor uploads
> > -1 and -2. So I suspect this may confuse reader that bug be reported
> > against src:gdcm,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:41:10AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> As you've noticed the ABI breakage occur in between two minor uploads
> -1 and -2. So I suspect this may confuse reader that bug be reported
> against src:gdcm, since obviously not a single line change could have
> occurred in
> This is a diff of a .symbols file I generated from libvtkgdcm2.8
> versions 2.8.7-1 and 2.8.7-2.
Thanks Mattia for tracking this issue !
As you've noticed the ABI breakage occur in between two minor uploads
-1 and -2. So I suspect this may confuse reader that bug be reported
against src:gdcm,
6 matches
Mail list logo
