Bug#911925: marked as done (S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends build and runtime)

2019-04-01 Thread Eric Degenetais
Hi there ! I am running stretch. I had blacklisted update 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1 because the bug made it useless as build JDK, and got update 8u212-b01-1~deb9u1, which as far as I can see fixes the problem. So as long as the last security version 8u212-b01-1~deb9u1 we do have a usable last openjdk-8 ve

Bug#911925: marked as done (S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends build and runtime)

2019-04-01 Thread Mark Carroll (Staff)
Does this mean you're leaving stable stuck with the version broken by the update (after applying the first patch but not the followup)? ): -- Mark The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096

Bug#911925: marked as done (S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends build and runtime)

2019-03-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:21:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#915620: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #911925, regarding S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends build and runtime to be marked as done. This m