Bug#920935: docker.io: ships /usr/bin/containerd-shim, already provided by containerd

2019-01-31 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Friday, 1 February 2019 12:06:37 PM AEDT Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > Is it a situation where we should put a Conflict statement? Like > `Conflicts: containerd` ? No, we should not conflict without a good reason. On this instance we have to rename binary back to "docker-containerd-shim" or insta

Bug#920935: docker.io: ships /usr/bin/containerd-shim, already provided by containerd

2019-01-31 Thread Arnaud Rebillout
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:23:14 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be > slightly out of sync): > > /usr/bin/containerd-shim > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > PS: for more informa

Bug#920935: docker.io: ships /usr/bin/containerd-shim, already provided by containerd

2019-01-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: docker.io Version: 18.09.1+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: