Package: gnome-core
Version: 1:3.30+1
Severity: serious
Justification: we should make a decision one way or another before release
I recently changed gnome-core to install gnome-flashback instead of
GNOME Shell on s390x, because: GNOME Shell is uninstallable on s390x, due
to mozjs60 not being func
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:29:06AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: gnome-core
> Version: 1:3.30+1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: we should make a decision one way or another before release
>
> I recently changed gnome-core to install gnome-flashback instead of
> GNOME Shell on s
On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 03:49:32 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> An additional option here which I'd like to propose would be to stop
> mucking around with dependencies to try to hide problems on those
> architectures. Instead "simply" do arch-specific removal of the broken
> packages, including
Hi Simon, all,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:29:06 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> I recently changed gnome-core to install gnome-flashback instead of
> GNOME Shell on s390x, because: GNOME Shell is uninstallable on s390x, due
> to mozjs60 not being functional there; testing migration requires task
> pack
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 20:10:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:29:06 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I recently changed gnome-core to install gnome-flashback instead of
> > GNOME Shell on s390x, because: GNOME Shell is uninstallable on s390x, due
> > to mozjs60 not being functi
Hi Simon,
On 16-05-2019 22:35, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> mozjs60 has been fixed (and uploaded by you to unstable), if I am
>> correct to actually enable this bug to be fixed.
>
> Unfortunately not. mozjs60 was believed to have been fixed (jcristau
> NMU'd it to experimental, and I re-uploaded to u
6 matches
Mail list logo
