Bug#925837: systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-17 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Am 18.08.19 um 03:13 schrieb أحمد المحمودي: > And a bit of access to architecturesthat I don't have access to (arm64 > for example) Even if you are not a DD you can get access to the porterboxes. For exactly this reason like here. https://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ If this is all to

Bug#925837: systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-17 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > This doesn't help, this just makes the symbols a bit more human readable. > dpkg-gensymbols generates a patch file output that helps to adjust the > symbols file, why not just use this with a bit of brain? And a bit of access to

Bug#925837: systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-17 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Control: tags -1 patch On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:35:04PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:48:14PM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > > gcc-9/g++-9, but succeeds to build with gcc-8/g++-8. The > >

Processed: Re: Bug#925837: systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #925837 [src:systemc] systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9 Added tag(s) patch. -- 925837: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925837 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#925837: systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-15 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:48:14PM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-9/g++-9, but succeeds to build with gcc-8/g++-8. The > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/porting_to.html > > [...] > - >